Herniated Disc, Severe Neck and Back Pain For Over a Year

Click LikeI have a herniated disc and had been living with severe neck and back pain for over a year.  As a working single mother, taking pain medication and/or muscle relaxers was not an option.  I have also had bad allergies and been on allergy medicine my entire life.  Neither of which I thought were related.

I took a friend’s advice and made an appointment to see Dr Horning.

Dr Horning was my last resort before breaking down to have surgery, something I was not quite ready for while still in my 30’s.

I was amazed at our first meeting because after so many doctors, specialists and prescriptions, Dr Horning was the only person that said he wanted to find out what was causing my pain and FIX the CAUSE of my pain without surgery and without medication.  I also saw that he loves his work and genuinely cared about my well being and wanted to help ME.  I immediately felt significant relief.

Over the next few weeks, I saw Dr Horning 3 days a week, we worked on my allergies and my pain, some visits would last up to an hour but Dr Horning made sure that I felt good before I walked out the door every time, no matter how long it took.

In a few short weeks, my allergies are in check, and my herniated disc gives me minimal aches.  I am pain free, medication free (both for the back and allergies) and am able to function and move around like normal.   I feel FANTASTIC!!!!!!

Thank you Dr Horning, you gave me my life back!!!!!



Will Drinking Diet Soda Help You Lose Weight?

SodaWill Drinking Diet Soda Help You Lose Weight?

By Dr. Mercola

Do you believe that drinking diet soda will allow you to “have your cake and eat it too” while still controlling your weight, or even shedding a few pounds? This is certainly what the soda industry wants you to believe.

Last year, Coca-Cola Company rolled out an ad campaign encouraging people to unite in the fight against obesity. The ads drew fire from consumers, consumer advocates, and obesity experts1, 2 alike.

Most people saw the campaign as little more than an effort in damage control, considering the overwhelming evidence linking soda consumption to obesity.

Soon thereafter, Coca-Cola Co. launched another ad campaign, this time assuring you that diet beverages containing the artificial sweetener aspartame are a safe alternative to regular soda.3

Now, the soda industry has taken their propaganda to the next level by publishing a study that claims to confirm what the industry has been saying all along—that drinking diet soda will help you lose weight.4, 5

Actually, the industry-funded trial claims diet soda drinkers lose weight faster than those who don’t drink ANY soda at all! Talk about going for broke. As reported by Time Magazine:6

“The small study, funded in part by the American Beverage Association, divided 300 diet soda drinkers into two groups. One group could go on drinking the sweet stuff, while the other cut out diet soda entirely.

The study found that the drinkers, with intensive coaching, lost an average of 13 pounds over 12 weeks, while the abstainers, with the same coaching, lost only 9 pounds…

‘The most likely explanation was that having access to drinks with sweet taste helps the [artificially-sweetened beverage] group to adhere better to the behavioral change program,’ concluded study author Dr. Jim Hill…”

Funding Research—The Best PR Money Can Buy

This study comes like a knight in shining armor, “just in the nick of time,” to rescue the soda industry’s rapidly dwindling sales.

Growing awareness of the health dangers associated with soda, both regular and diet, has pushed beverage sales into a freefall.7 Sales of carbonated beverages in general fell three percent in 2013, while diet Coke and diet Pepsi both dropped by nearly seven percent.8

Purdue University researcher Susie Swithers9 has strongly criticized the featured study, saying it is “fatally flawed, and leaves us with little science to build on.”

For example, it does not contain any information about what the non-diet soda drinkers were actually consuming. While water was suggested as the ideal beverage, did they actuallydrink water, or did they compensate with fruit juices and regular soda instead?

Susie Swithers’ own research shows that diet drinks promote heart problems, and that animals fed artificial sweeteners develop a disrupted metabolic response to real sugar. Earlier this year, she told MedicineNet.com:10

“[Like diabetics], they become hyperglycemic. Their blood sugars go up higher than they should. They also make less of a heart-protective protein. If drinking diet soda interferes with this system, then over the long term you’re taking something away that protects your cardiovascular health, and that could be what’s contributing to these effects.”

Furthermore, with so much evidence weighing against the safety and effectiveness of diet soda, whether for weight loss or any other disease prevention, the featured industry-funded study really offers no scientifically relevant evidence at all that might shift the balance in diet soda’s favor. As Swithers notes, “this paper tells us nothing about the long-term health consequences that should be our real focus.” What the study CAN do, however, is create media buzz and splashy headlines where the words “science,” “study,” and “proven weight loss” are favorably combined, and that is worth more than anything a PR firm might cook up.

Industry Funding Dramatically Increases Odds of Favorable Research Results

The misuse of science to further a preconceived commercial agenda is so rampant today that it can be quite tricky to determine what’s what. One key factor is to determine who paid for the research, because when industry funds the research, it’s virtually guaranteed to be favorable. Quite simply, an independent researcher has far less incentive to come to any particular conclusion—good or bad.

I’ve previously said that we’ve left evidence-based decision-making behind, and we’re now in an era of “decision-based evidence-making.” What I mean by that is that the preferred business model of an industry is created first, followed by “scientific evidence” that has been specifically created to support the established business model.

This is yet another perfect example of this. After two failed marketing campaigns (the latter of which was designed to look like a public service announcement rather than a classic advertisement), the beverage industry turned to “science” in an effort to win back customers.

As I discussed in a previous article, the Calorie Control Council is an association that represents manufacturers and suppliers of low-calorie, sugar-free, and reduced sugar foods and beverages. It is, of course, a staunch defender of aspartame’s safety and effectiveness for weight management and diabetic control, and is quick to dismiss any research that suggests otherwise.

The group recently denounced research showing that post-menopausal diet soda drinkers raise their risk of heart attacks and stroke, stating that such findings “do not support the majority of the scientific evidence on the topic, and are at odds with statements from the American Heart Association.”11

What many don’t realize is that the Calorie Control Council has strong ties to the Kellen Company, which is instrumental in creating and managing industry front groups specifically created to mislead you about the product in question, protect industry profits, and influence regulatory agencies. Unfortunately for anyone who has fallen for the false advertising, diet soda actually tends to promote weight gain, and numerous studies that were NOT funded by industry attest to this.

The List of Studies Refuting ‘Diet’ Claims Is Long

Research has repeatedly shown that artificially sweetened no- or low-calorie drinks and other “diet” foods tend to stimulate your appetite, increase cravings for carbs, and stimulate fat storage and weight gain. Artificial sweeteners basically trick your body into thinking that it’s going to receive sugar (calories), but when the sugar doesn’t arrive, your body signals that it needs more, which results in carb cravings. Most people give in to such cravings and end up overeating on other foods and snacks.

This connection between sweet taste alone and increased hunger can be found in the medical literature going back at least two decades. But artificial sweeteners also appear to produce a variety of metabolic dysfunctions that promote weight gain. Here’s a sampling of some of the studies published through the years, clearly refuting the beverage industry’s claims that diet soda aids weight loss:

Preventive Medicine, 198612 This study examined nearly 78,700 women aged 50-69 for one year. Artificial sweetener usage increased with relative weight, and users were significantly more likely to gain weight, compared to those who did not use artificial sweeteners—regardless of their initial weight. According to the researchers, the results “were not explicable by differences in food consumption patterns. The data do not support the hypothesis that long-term artificial sweetener use either helps weight loss or prevents weight gain.”
Physiology and Behavior, 198813 In this study, they determined that intense (no- or low-calorie) sweeteners can produce significant changes in appetite. Of the three sweeteners tested, aspartame produced the most pronounced effects.
Physiology and Behavior, 199014 Here, they found that aspartame had a time-dependent effect on appetite, “producing a transient decrease followed by a sustained increase in hunger ratings.”
Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 199115 In a study of artificial sweeteners performed on college students, there was no evidence that artificial sweetener use was associated with a decrease in their overall sugar intake either.
International Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, 200416 This Purdue University study found that rats fed artificially sweetened liquids ate more high-calorie food than rats fed high-calorie sweetened liquids. The researchers believe the experience of drinking artificially sweetened liquids disrupted the animals’ natural ability to compensate for the calories in the food.
San Antonio Heart Study, 200517 Data gathered from the 25-year long San Antonio Heart Study also showed that drinking diet soft drinks increased the likelihood of serious weight gain – far more so than regular soda.18 On average, for each diet soft drink the participants drank per day, they were 65 percent more likely to become overweight during the next seven to eight years, and 41 percent more likely to become obese.
Journal of Biology and Medicine, 201019 This study delves into the neurobiology of sugar cravings and summarizes the epidemiological and experimental evidence concerning the effect of artificial sweeteners on weight.

According to the authors: “[F]indings suggest that the calorie contained in natural sweeteners may trigger a response to keep the overall energy consumption constant. …Increasing evidence suggests that artificial sweeteners do not activate the food reward pathways in the same fashion as natural sweeteners… [A]rtificial sweeteners, precisely because they are sweet, encourage sugar craving and sugar dependence.”

Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 201020 This review offers a summary of epidemiological and experimental evidence concerning the effects of artificial sweeteners on weight, and explains those effects in light of the neurobiology of food reward. It also shows the correlation between increased usage of artificial sweeteners in food and drinks, and the corresponding rise in obesity.
Appetite, 201221 Here, researchers showed that saccharin and aspartame both cause greater weight gain than sugar, even when the total caloric intake remains similar.
Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 201322 This report highlights the fact that diet soda drinkers suffer the same exact health problems as those who opt for regular soda, such as excessive weight gain, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke.23, 24 The researchers speculate that frequent consumption of artificial sweeteners may induce metabolic derangements.

Comprehensive Review Finds You Gain Weight by Drinking Diet Soda

The 2010 review in the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine25 is of particular relevance here, as it offers a great historical summary of artificial sweeteners in general, and the epidemiological and experimental evidence showing that artificial sweeteners tend to promote weight gain. It also illustrates that as usage of artificial sweeteners has risen, so has obesity rates—despite all these “diet friendly” products. According to a recent Democrat & Chronicle article,26a University of Texas Health Science Center study found that frequent drinkers of diet sodas had waist circumference increases that were 500 percent greater than non-drinkers of diet soda.”

Source: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine June 8, 2010: v83(2)

According to the author:

“Intuitively, people choose non-caloric artificial sweeteners over sugar to lose or maintain weight…But do artificial sweeteners actually help reduce weight? Surprisingly, epidemiologic data suggest the contrary. Several large scale prospective cohort studies found positive correlation between artificial sweetener use and weight gain.

The San Antonio Heart Study examined 3,682 adults over a seven to eight year period in the 1980s. When matched for initial body mass index (BMI), gender, ethnicity, and diet, drinkers of artificially sweetened beverages consistently had higher BMIs at the follow-up, with dose dependence on the amount of consumption. Average BMI gain was +1.01 kg/m2 for control and 1.78 kg/m2 for people in the third quartile for artificially sweetened beverage consumption.”

The review also highlights the 1986 study published in Preventive Medicine27 (also listed above). Again, nearly 78,700 women were included in this American Cancer Society study, and at one year follow-up, 2.7 percent to 7.1 percent more artificial sweetener users had gained weight, when compared to non-users and matched by initial weight. A later study,28performed in the 1990s, also found that women who regularly used saccharin gained more weight over an eight year period, compared to non-users. The same kind of results are found in studies evaluating the effect of artificial sweeteners in children:

  • In one two-year long study,29 which involved 166 school children, increased diet soda consumption was associated with higher BMI at the end of the trial.
  • The Growing Up Today Study,30 which included more than 11,650 children aged 9-14, also found a positive association between diet soda consumption and weight gain in boys. Each daily serving of diet beverage was associated with a BMI increase of 0.16 kg/m2.
  • The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study31 included 2,371 girls aged 9-19 for 10 years. Soda consumption in general, both regular and diet, was associated with increase in total daily energy intake.
  • Another 2003 study looking at 3,111 children found diet soda, specifically, was associated with higher BMI.32

Diet Soda May Harm Diabetics to Greater Degree Than Sugar

How much evidence do you need before you make up your mind? Will one study showing serious harm make you think twice about drinking diet soda? Will 10… 50… 100 studies bring you to a decision? Besides decimating the claim that diet soda is a useful diet aid, studies have also linked diet drinks and artificial sweeteners to a number of other, more serious health hazards, including increased risk of stroke and cancer. There are in fact hundreds of published studies demonstrating the harmful effects of aspartame… Yet the industry keeps repeating the mantra that “no harmful effects have ever been proven.”

After hearing it so many times, many actually believe this to be true. Browsing through the medical literature, however, will quickly reveal such claims to be a stretch, if not an outright lie. For starters, researchers have demonstrated that aspartame worsens insulin sensitivity to a greater degree than sugar. This is a serious blow for diabetics who follow the recommendation to switch to diet sodas to manage their condition. It’s worth noting that the study in question used a dosage of aspartame that approximates the ADI for aspartame in the US (approx. 50 mg/kg body weight), and not only was aspartame found to decrease insulin sensitivity compared to controls, it also wrought havoc on brain function!

Studies Also Warn of More Serious Health Hazards

Two years ago, preliminary research warned that diet soda appears to dramatically increase your risk of stroke. The researchers found that people who drank diet soft drinks on a daily basis were 43 percent more likely to have suffered a vascular event, including a stroke. This association persisted even after controlling for other factors that could increase the risk, such as smoking, physical activity levels, alcohol consumption, diabetes, heart disease, dietary factors, and more. According to the authors:

“This study suggests that diet soda is not an optimal substitute for sugar-sweetened beverages, and may be associated with a greater risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death than regular soda.”

Of even greater concern are the studies suggesting a link between artificial sweeteners and cancer—the number one killer of Americans under the age of 85:33

  • One lifetime feeding study published in 201034 found that aspartame induced cancers of the liver and lung in male mice. It was also carcinogenic in male and female rats.
  • The most comprehensive and longest human study — spanning 22 years — that has ever looked at aspartame toxicity was published in 2012. It evaluated the effect between aspartame intake and cancer, and the researchers found a clear association between aspartame consumption and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and leukemia.

FDA Approval Means Little When It Comes to Ascertaining Safety

As previously noted by Dr. Janet Hull,35 many tend to excuse the negative health effects of aspartame simply because it has received the stamp of approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “[T]his may not be something the American consumer can actually depend upon anymore,” she writes, because “[t]he FDA rules and regulations for the approval of food additives… it has some serious flaws.”

As discussed in her article, “Abusing the FDA Approval Process,36 the FDA requires that the industry do its own research, and actually places the burden of proof on the company making the product. Dr. Hull explains:

“Basically, all the FDA is responsible for is reviewing the summaries of research conducted by the company applying for approval, typically from scientific studies the applicant has pay-rolled. Then, the company presents their reasons why their product should be allowed in the public food supply based on their research. At the very least, the research reports are controversial, and rarely reviewed by independent researchers not related to the industry.”

Should you still be confused on this issue, thinking that the buck somehow stops at the FDA, FDA spokesman Theresa Eisenman recently clarified who is ultimately responsible for making sure a food product is safe, stating that:37 “Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that their food products are safe and lawful…”

But what company would really make a serious effort to find problems with the very products they want to capitalize on? Despite this illogical premise, the FDA trusts corporations to be honest in their research and evaluations. How likely do you think it is that this “honor system” will actually ensure that each product released to market is safe?

When it comes to artificial sweeteners, aspartame in particular, there’s no doubt in my mind that the system has protected industry profits at consumers’ expense. And we’ve not seen the last of it. Despite mounting evidence showing that artificial sweeteners as a group have adverse health effects, the FDA has just approved yet another artificial sweetener called Advantame,38, 39 derived from a combination of aspartame and vanillin.

Being 20,000 times sweeter than refined sugar, Advantame is the sweetest artificial sweetener so far. To put this into perspective, aspartame, sucralose, and saccharine range from 200 to 700 times sweeter than sugar. Also, as reported by the LA Times:40

“Like aspartame, advantame contains phenylalanine, which is metabolized with difficulty by people with a rare genetic disorder, phenylketonuria. But because of its intense sweetness, advantame would be used at much lower volumes than is asparatame. As a result, the FDA has declared that it can be safely consumed by those with phenylketonuria.”

Are You Ready to Ditch Diet Soda?

When you consume artificial sweeteners, your brain actually craves more calories because your body receives no satisfaction on a cellular level by the sugar imposter. This can contribute to not only overeating and weight gain, but also an addiction to artificial sweeteners. To break free, I recommend addressing any emotional component of your food cravings using a tool such as the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT).

A version of EFT specifically geared toward combating sugar cravings is called Turbo Tapping. For further instructions, please see the article, “Turbo Tapping: How to Get Rid of Your Soda Addiction.” The video below with EFT practitioner Julie Schiffman also demonstrates how to use EFT to fight food cravings of all kinds.


If you still have cravings after trying EFT or Turbo Tapping, you may need to make some changes to your diet. My free nutrition plan can help you do this in a step-by-step fashion. As for safer sweetener options, you could use stevia or Luo Han, both of which are safe natural sweeteners. That said, if you struggle with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or extra weight, then you have insulin sensitivity issues and would likely benefit from avoiding ALL sweeteners.

Last but not least, if you experience side effects from aspartame or any other artificial sweetener, please report it to the FDA (if you live in the United States) without delay. It’s easy to make a report — just go to the FDA Consumer Complaint Coordinator page, find the phone number for your state, and make a call reporting your reaction.

Sources and References

Hope this helps,

Dr. Horning


Horning Chiropractic Center
Dr. Jeffrey Horning
127 Ark Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Fax: 856-778-4909

Probiotics Benefit Metabolic Syndrome Patients

supplementsA study found that probiotics could help improve the metabolic syndrome by counteracting the adverse effects of a high-fat diet. Metabolic syndrome is a condition characterized by central obesity, hypertension, and disturbed glucose and insulin metabolism.

The benefit comes as a result of reduction in tissue inflammation and metabolic endotaxemia.

NutraIngredients states that:

“The current study involved administering the probiotic strain B420 to diabetic mice on a high-fat diet. According to the researchers, the probiotic improved the fasting glycemia and restored the glucose turnover rate to the level of the control mice fed with normal chow.”

Sources: NutraIngredients April 20, 2010

Low Back Pain

Click LikeLow Back Pain

I am an Ice Hockey Player and this is my life.

Hi. My name is C.P. and I am an Ice Hockey Player. This is my life.

I live to play hockey. I play travel hockey for the Flyers Youth and High School Hockey for Lenape. Last year I played Varsity Ice Hockey as a Freshman. After the end of the season, I started to have a pain in my lower back. I thought it was just from playing a very rigorous and physical sport. I iced my back, rested, and took Ibuprofen. My back got better.

This summer I went to the Penn State Ice Hockey Camp. On the fourth day of the camp, I took a slap shot and had to limp off to the bench. The trainers were great. They iced my back and I was good to go. But lo and behold, when I got home and had to practice with my Flyers Youth team, I could barely make one hour of practice. This was very upsetting to me. I live to play hockey. My Mom took me to the doctor and they said to ice it, stretch it, and take Ibuprofen.

My back was not getting better. My entire family was very upset, including me. I live to play hockey and I could not play to my full potential. I could not make an hour of practice and then I could not even sit in the car.

Then my Mom remembered that her friend worked for Dr. Horning. We made an appointment and after a week of rest and three adjustments I could skate at practice.

This made me very happy because I love to skate. That weekend I went on to play two very physical hockey games and I was not in pain. This is the best thing that ever happened to me. I have had literally 9 adjustments and I have no more pain in my back.

I love Dr. Homing. He gave me my hockey back. I will continue to get adjustments because I want to be “on top of my game”. I do not think I will ever stop. I want to be healthy the rest of my life. I do not just want to “put a band aid” on my pain. I realize I play a very physical and demanding sport but I know that with the help of Dr. Homing I can play the sport that I love for the rest of my life!!! Not only did my pain go away, I know that I will be good with continuing adjustments for the rest of my life.



American Foods Chockfull of Ingredients Banned in Other Countries

Processed FoodMore than 3,000 food additives — preservatives, flavorings, colors and other ingredients — are added to foods in the United States. Many of these additives are banned in other countries

Ingredients banned in other countries yet allowed in the US include various food dyes, the fat substitute Olestra, brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate (aka brominanted flour), Azodicarbonamide, BHA, BHT, rBGH, rBST, and arsenic

Russia has announced a ban on virtually all U.S. meat and meat product imports, effective February 11, due to the feed additive ractopamine in the meats

In the US, ditching processed foods is your best bet to avoid potentially harmful food additives. If you live in Europe you may have more options, as you may be able to find processed foods that do not contain any synthetic additives at all


Herniated Disc, A Patient Testimonial

Click LikeMy wife and I were referred to Dr. Horning when she had a severe class 4 herniated disc that was exacerbated by the pressure put on the sciatic nerve.  However, not knowing about chiropractors or chiropractic care, there was some trepidation.

So we went to the hospital and she was shot up with numerous vaccines to numb the pain, and then eventually came the consult with the doctor.  The doctor said within just a minute of looking at the X-RAY that surgery was inevitable. He also declared that in the meantime we’ll give her the epidural and if that works well than surgery would be not needed.

Well, I for one was vehemently against drugs of any kind and I’ve heard if at all possible avoid all back surgery.

So our journey with Dr. Horning began… and boy am I glad it did! Dr. Horning assured us that he could remedy the situation and said that surgery would not be needed. So we took a Leap of faith and within 4 weeks the pain had dramatically decreased and within 8 weeks she was back doing stretches and light exercise.

She continued to improve so much that in time she was back doing yoga and rigorous exercise. I was watching her heal right before my eyes and at the time I was exhibiting some issues and became a patient too!  I had knee pain and after just seven sessions I was pain free and feeling better than I had been in awhile.

Today, we are both pain free and make chiropractic a regular part of our lives.  So do yourself a favor and give Dr. Horning a chance to cure your ills naturally… trust me you won’t regret it.





Four foods proven to lower cholesterol and protect the heart

WalnutsFour foods proven to lower cholesterol and protect the heart

by: Michael Ravensthorpe

(NaturalNews) According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 71 million Americans, or 33.5 percent of the total population, suffer from high LDL cholesterol. Only one in three of these individuals has their condition under control, while less than half of them choose to treat it at all. Moreover, the average total cholesterol for adult Americans is around 200 mg/dL, which is borderline high risk. (1) We are, in short, at greater risk of heart disease than ever before.

Though doctors love to throw statins and other drugs at people with high cholesterol, an improvement in diet is a far safer and more effective long-term solution to the problem. Most whole foods are likely to reduce LDL and total cholesterol to some degree, but the foods listed below are especially effective in this regard.


Few foods can beat oatmeal at reducing cholesterol. This traditional breakfast food is packed with soluble fiber which, according to an extensive 19-year study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, can lower cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease. (2) Moreover, oatmeal is rich in a specific kind of soluble fiber called beta-glucan that is particularly good at blocking our bodies’ ability to absorb cholesterol. (3)

Organic, unsweetened oatmeal is easy to purchase online or in health food stores and is best consumed in the morning with milk. Adding some fruit to the oats, such as bananas or strawberries, will boost its fiber content further.


Avocados are one of the best fruits to consume for treating high cholesterol. Firstly, they’re packed with oleic acid, a monounsaturated fat which, as a study in the Journal of Lipid Research proved, can inhibit the synthesis of cholesteroland lipids in human cells. (4) Secondly, they’re also rich in a plant chemical called beta-sitosterol, which suppresses cholesterol absorption in the intestine. (5)

Though avocados are usually eaten on their own, they’re known to increase the absorption of disease-fighting antioxidants found in fruits and vegetables. Therefore, adding them to salads and other meals is a great way to boost nutrient intake.


Fish has always been regarded as good for the heart, and we now understand why: Its high levels of omega-3 fatty acids are proven to lower blood pressure, reduce the risk of blood clots and decrease total and LDL cholesterol. (6) Fish is so beneficial for the cardiovascular system, in fact, that the American Heart Association recommends eating at least two servings of it per week. (7)

The fish richest in omega-3 acids (including EPA and DHA) are salmon, mackerel, tuna, trout, sardines and herring. For obvious reasons, it’s best to avoid fish from the Pacific Ocean these days.


Though they are best-known for improving brain function, walnuts also excel at lowering cholesterol. A review published in The Journal of Nutrition in April 2014, for instance, showed that these hard-shelled nuts could “decrease low density lipoprotein cholesterol (by ~9-16%) and blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure by ~2-3 mm Hg), 2 major risk factors for [cardiovascular disease].” (8) The cholesterol-lowering properties of walnuts are mostly attributed to their high concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as alpha-linolenic acid, which can lower cholesterol and triglycerides in the bloodstream. (9)

Other nuts rich in beneficial, cholesterol-lowering fats include almonds, hazelnuts, pistachios, pine nuts and pecans. Like all fruits, nuts are best eaten raw for maximum benefits.

Sources for this article include:

(1) http://www.cdc.gov
(2) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(4) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(5) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(6) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(7) http://www.heart.org
(8) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(9) https://umm.edu


Hope this helps,

Dr. Horning


Like us on Facebook!



Horning Chiropractic Center
Dr. Jeffrey Horning
127 Ark Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Fax: 856-778-4909